¶Musk gave an update in front of SpaceX’s assembled Starship Mk1 airframe. 11 years after its first successful orbital mission, SpaceX presented Starship Mk1, a full-size prototype of their next generation spacecraft. Starship, 3m in diameter and 50m tall, is the largest second stage ever built (it's easy to forget that it’s just a second stage). Mk1 has three atmospheric Raptor engines, with the final version adding 3 vacuum-optimized engines as well, and will reenter the atmosphere in a fall similar to a skydiver, with actuated canards and body flaps to control its descent [video]. Musk is touting its stainless steel construction as a cost and weight savings due to reduced structural and heat shielding requirements. Instead of previously announced transpirational cooling mechanisms, orbital versions of Starship will sport thin, non-ablative ceramic tiles to distribute heat evenly on the windward side of the craft. Due to the steel structure, heatshield tiles are less critical than they were on the Space Shuttle. (The only reason STS-27 wasn’t a disaster was thanks to a steel antenna mount that happened to be behind a damaged heat shield tile.) While the Mk1 prototype lacks some polish [super high-res image showing all the dents and welds… that may crash your computer], versions as soon as Mk3 will use a continuous coil of steel joined by a single seam weld. Starship will sit atop the 68 m tall SuperHeavy, which is now slated to be powered by 24 to 37 Raptors depending on mission, requiring Raptors to be produced at about 1/day—it’s about 8 days per engine right now—which may be a stretch with their many complex components made of high-pressure (~800 bar!) and heat resistant superalloys. The next milestone is a ~20km flight in 1-2 months, and in typical Elon fashion, he said "this is going to sound totally nuts but I think we're going to try to reach orbit in less than six months." (Related: Musk and Bridenstine’s small spat about slipping timelines for Crew Dragon, with the NASA administrator calling out SpaceX, probably due to an impending need to buy more $80 million+ seats from Russia, while Boeing’s very similar timeline has mostly flown under the radar.) |